Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Revision ACL reconstruction, but not bilateral ACL reconstruction, is associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACL reconstruction: A comparative analysis of 6831 patients.
Cristiani, Riccardo; Hamrin Senorski, Eric; Helito, Camilo P; Samuelsson, Kristian; Stålman, Anders.
Afiliación
  • Cristiani R; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Sports Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hamrin Senorski E; Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center (SSTRC), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Helito CP; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Samuelsson K; Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Stålman A; Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39359210
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate and compare the subjective knee function in patients undergoing revision and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with those undergoing primary ACLR in a large cohort.

METHODS:

Patients without concomitant ligament injuries who underwent primary, revision or bilateral ACLR at the Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2005 and 2018 were identified. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Patients who underwent revision and bilateral ACLR were compared with those who underwent primary ACLR (control group) using Student's t test.

RESULTS:

A total of 6831 patients (6102 with primary ACLRs, 343 with revision ACLRs and 386 with bilateral ACLRs) were included. Preoperatively, there were significant but nonclinically relevant differences in favour of the revision ACLR group for KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport/Rec subscale scores compared with the primary ACLR group. Postoperatively, except for the 1-year Symptoms and ADL subscales, the revision ACLR group reported significantly lower scores on all KOOS subscales than the primary ACLR group, with clinically relevant differences (>8-10 points) for the 1-, 2- and 5-year Sport/Rec and Quality of Life (QOL) subscales. The bilateral ACLR group reported significantly, but not clinically relevant, inferior scores on the 1-year Symptoms and QOL subscales and the 5-year Sport/Rec and QOL subscales compared with the primary ACLR group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Revision ACLR, but not bilateral ACLR, was associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACLR. It is important to counsel patients regarding their future subjective knee function after repeated ACLR. Compared to primary ACLR, inferior subjective results should be expected after revision ACLR, but not after bilateral ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Alemania