Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients
Elisa Kortela; Vesa Kirjavainen; Maarit Ahava; Suvi Jokiranta; Anna But; Anna Lindahl; Anu Elina Jaaskelainen; Annemarjut J Jaaskelainen; Asko Jarvinen; Pia Jokela; Hannimari Kallio-Kokko; Raisa Loginov; Laura Mannonen; Eeva Ruotsalainen; Tarja Sironen; Olli Vapalahti; Maija Lappalainen; Hanna-Riikka Kreivi; Hanna Jarva; Satu Kurkela; Eliisa Kekalainen.
Afiliación
  • Elisa Kortela; Division of Infectious diseases, Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Vesa Kirjavainen; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Maarit Ahava; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Suvi Jokiranta; Translational Immunology Research Program and Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Anna But; Biostatistics consulting, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Anna Lindahl; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Anu Elina Jaaskelainen; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Annemarjut J Jaaskelainen; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Asko Jarvinen; Division of Infectious diseases, Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Pia Jokela; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Hannimari Kallio-Kokko; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Raisa Loginov; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Laura Mannonen; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Eeva Ruotsalainen; Division of Infectious diseases, Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Tarja Sironen; Department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Hels
  • Olli Vapalahti; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and Department of Veterinary B
  • Maija Lappalainen; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Hanna-Riikka Kreivi; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Hanna Jarva; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital and Translational Immunology Research Program and D
  • Satu Kurkela; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • Eliisa Kekalainen; HUSLAB Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital and Translational Immunology Research Program and D
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-20223107
Artículo de revista
Un artículo publicado en revista científica está disponible y probablemente es basado en este preprint, por medio del reconocimiento de similitud realizado por una máquina. La confirmación humana aún está pendiente.
Ver artículo de revista
ABSTRACT
ImportanceUnderstanding the false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is pivotal for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and it has practical implications for patient management in healthcare facilities. ObjectiveTo determine the real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. DesignA retrospective study on case series from 4 March - 15 April 2020. SettingA population-based study conducted in primary and tertiary care in the Helsinki Capital Region, Finland. ParticipantsAdults who were clinically suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection and underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, and who had sufficient data for grading of clinical suspicion of COVID-19 in their medical records were eligible. All 1,194 inpatients admitted to COVID-19 cohort wards during the study period were included. The outpatient cohort of 1,814 individuals was sampled from epidemiological line lists by systematic quasi-random sampling. Altogether 83 eligible outpatients (4.6%) and 3 inpatients (0.3%) were excluded due to insufficient data for grading of clinical suspicion. ExposuresHigh clinical suspicion for COVID-19 was used as the reference standard for the RT-PCR test. Patients were considered to have high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 if the physician in charge recorded the suspicion on clinical grounds, or the patient fulfilled specifically defined clinical and exposure criteria. Main measuresSensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR by using manually curated clinical characteristics as the gold standard. ResultsThe study population included 1,814 outpatients (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [17.2] years; 69.1% women) and 1,194 inpatients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [18.3] years; 45.2% women). The sensitivity (95% CI) for laboratory confirmed cases, i.e. repeatedly tested patients were as follows 85.7% (81.5-89.1%) inpatients; 95.5% (92.2-97.5%) outpatients, 89.9% (88.2-92.1%) all. When also patients that were graded as high suspicion but never tested positive were included in the denominator, the following sensitivity values (95% CI) were observed 67.5% (62.9-71.9%) inpatients; 34.9% (31.4-38.5%) outpatients; 47.3% (44.4-50.3%) all. Conclusions and relevanceThe clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing was only moderate at best. The relatively high false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing need to be accounted for in clinical decision making, epidemiological interpretations and when using RT-PCR as a reference for other tests. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test? FindingsIn this population-based retrospective study on medical records of 1,814 outpatients and 1,194 inpatients, the clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was 47.3-89.9%. MeaningThe false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing need to be accounted for in clinical decision making, epidemiological interpretations and when using RT-PCR as a reference for other tests.
Licencia
cc_no
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Cohort_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Cohort_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Preprint