Effects of cyclosporine-impregnated versus freeze-dried bone allografts in repairing radial defects in rabbits: a comparative study / 南方医科大学学报
Journal of Southern Medical University
; (12): 266-269, 2010.
Article
en Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-269576
Biblioteca responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the effects of cyclosporine-impregnated bone allograft (CAB) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDAB) in repairing radial defects in rabbits.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into bone graft donor group, experimental group, and control group (n=10). The bilateral ilia of the donor rabbits were dissected to prepare CAB and FDAB. In the other 20 rabbits, a 10-mm long segmental osteoperiosteal defect was induced in the right radius and repaired with CAB (experimental group) or with FDAB (control group). At postoperative weeks 4 and 12, 5 rabbits from each group were sacrificed to evaluate the bone healing by radiographic, general and histological observations.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Four weeks after the operation, the rabbits in the experimental group showed significantly higher X-ray scores (P=0.001) with greater amount of new bone and better incorporation of the allograft and autogenous bone than those in the control group. At 12 weeks, the X-ray scores were still significantly higher in the experimental group (P=0.002), which also showed better bone remodeling than the control group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>CAB is superior to FDAB for repairing radial defects in rabbits, but the potential involvement of local immunoreaction in this difference awaits further investigation.</p>
Texto completo:
1
Base de datos:
WPRIM
Asunto principal:
Farmacología
/
Radio (Anatomía)
/
Cirugía General
/
Trasplante Homólogo
/
Heridas y Lesiones
/
Regeneración Ósea
/
Trasplante Óseo
/
Ciclosporina
/
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica
/
Liofilización
Límite:
Animals
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Journal of Southern Medical University
Año:
2010
Tipo del documento:
Article