Effects of prophylactic chemotherapy on outcomes and prognosis of patients older than 40 years with invasive mole / 中华妇产科杂志
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
; (12): 398-402, 2017.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
| ID: wpr-609024
Biblioteca responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss the effects of prophylactic chemotherapy on the outcomes and prognosis of invasive mole patients.Methods One hundred and fifteen invasive mole (IM) patients older than 40 years were registered in Peking Union Medical Collage Hospital.Eleven of them were treated with prophylactic chemotherapy before diagnosed as IM prophylactic chemotherapy group,while the other 104 cases received therapeutic chemotherapy after diagnosed as IM (non-prophylactic chemotherapy group).The general clinical data (including age,clinical stage,risk factor score),treatment,outcomes and relapse of patients were retrospectively compared between two groups.Results (1) The age of prophylactic chemotherapy group and non-prophylactic chemotherapy group were (47±5) versus (46±4) years old.Ratio of clinical stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ were 3/11 versus 29.8% (31/104),clinical stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ were 8/11 versus 70.2% (73/104).Ratio of risk factor score 0-6 were 11/11 versus 84.6% (88/104),risk factor score >6 were 0 versus 15.4%(16/104).There were no significant statistical differences between two groups in age,clinical stage or risk factor score (all P>0.05).(2) Treatmentthe total chemotherapy courses between prophylactic chemotherapy group and non-prophylactic chemotherapy group (median 7 versus 5) were significantly different (Z=3.071,P=0.002).There were no significant statistical differences between two groups in the chemotherapy courses until negative conversion of β-hCG,consolidation chemotherapy courses,total therapeutic chemotherapy courses or ratio of hysterectomy (all P>0.05).(3) Outcomes and relapsebetween the prophylactic chemotherapy group and the non-prophylactic chemotherapy group,the complete remission rate were 11/11 versus 98.1%(102/104),the relapse rate were 0 versus 1.0%(1/102).There were no significant difference between the two groups in outcomes or relapse rate (P>0.05).Conclusions Prophylactic chemotherapy does not substantially benefit the IM patients older than 40 years.Prophylactic chemotherapy may not significantly improve patients' prognosis,in which increased sample size is required in further study.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Base de datos:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio pronóstico
/
Factores de riesgo
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Año:
2017
Tipo del documento:
Artículo