Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis / How to interpret systematic reviews with multiple comparisons or network meta-analysis
Rev. méd. Chile
; 148(1): 109-117, Jan. 2020. tab, graf
Article
em Es
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1094213
Biblioteca responsável:
CL1.1
ABSTRACT
Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons, called network meta-analysis (NMA), can be a useful approach to find a clinical answer when multiple interventions are evaluated for the same outcome or comparator. The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics and provide a user guide for a critical analysis of NMA focusing on its three main domains, namely homogeneity, transitivity and consistency.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
LILACS
Assunto principal:
Metanálise em Rede
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Systematic_reviews
Idioma:
Es
Revista:
Rev. méd. Chile
Assunto da revista:
MEDICINA
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Chile
/
Estados Unidos
País de publicação:
Chile