Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Removal of denture adhesives from PMMA and Polyamide denture base materials
Polychronakis, Nick; Sykaras, Nikitas; Polyzois, Gregory; Lagouvardos, Panagiotis.
Afiliação
  • Polychronakis, Nick; National & Kapodistrian University of Athens. School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Athens. GR
  • Sykaras, Nikitas; National & Kapodistrian University of Athens. School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Athens. GR
  • Polyzois, Gregory; National & Kapodistrian University of Athens. School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics. Athens. GR
  • Lagouvardos, Panagiotis; National & Kapodistrian University of Athens. School of Dentistry. Department of Operative Dentistry. Athens. GR
J. appl. oral sci ; 29: e20200448, 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1154618
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract Denture adhesives need complete removal due to their frequent replacement. Objective Our study investigates the removal of denture adhesives from denture base materials, using different methods. Methodology PMMA and Polyamide denture base materials were used to fabricate 120 samples (15×15×1.5mm). One side of the samples was left as processed and the other polished with a usual procedure, hydrated for 24 h, dried, and weighted. They received 0.2 g of three adhesive creams on their unpolished surface (Corega, Olivafix, Fittydent), pressed on polysulfide material, stored under 37°C and 95% rel. humidity for 1 h and 60 of them, following their separation from polysulfide base, brushed under running water, whereas the rest inserted in a cleanser bath (Fittydent Super) for 5 min. The samples were dried and inserted in the oven (37°C) for additional 10 min and weighted again. Roughness tests of denture materials and light microscopy of adhesives creams were also used to evaluate the materials. Time lapse images of spayed with water adhesives on PMMA base were also taken to evaluate the volumetric changes of adhesives. Weight data before and after adhesive removal, indicating the amount of remaining adhesive, were statistically analyzed using Welch's ANOVA and Games-Howell multiple comparisons tests at α=0.05 level of significance. Results Roughness of Polyamide was higher than PMMA and Fittydent showed greater volumetric changes than the others. Significant differences (p<0.05), were found between PMMA and Polyamide bases, between Olivafix and Fittydent adhesives, and between brushing and cleansing methods but only for PMMA-Olivafix combination. Conclusions Adhesives showed a stronger adherence to PMMA surface, and Fittydent was the most difficult to be removed. Removal methods were not effective for all adhesives or denture base materials. These indicate that removal methods, adhesive type and denture base material are all playing a significant role in the removal of adhesives from denture surfaces.
Assuntos


Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Bases de Dentadura / Nylons Idioma: Inglês Revista: J. appl. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Grécia Instituição/País de afiliação: National & Kapodistrian University of Athens/GR

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Bases de Dentadura / Nylons Idioma: Inglês Revista: J. appl. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Grécia Instituição/País de afiliação: National & Kapodistrian University of Athens/GR
...