Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surface roughness of three different glass ionomers with our without finishing/polishing: an in vitro study
Machado, Cláudia Filipa Azevedo; Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira; Fernandes, Juliana Campos Hasse; Seabra, Mariana; Figueiredo, Andreia.
Afiliação
  • Machado, Cláudia Filipa Azevedo; Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Faculty of Dental Medicine. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health. Viseu. PT
  • Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira; University of Michigan School of Dentistry. Ann Arbor. US
  • Fernandes, Juliana Campos Hasse; s.af
  • Seabra, Mariana; Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Faculty of Dental Medicine. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health. Viseu. PT
  • Figueiredo, Andreia; Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Faculty of Dental Medicine. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health. Viseu. PT
Rev. Flum. Odontol. (Online) ; 1(63): 146-167, jan-abr. 2024. ilus, tab
Article em En | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1567017
Biblioteca responsável: BR218.1
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

This study aimed to compare the surface roughness among 3 types of glass ionomers (GI) before (no polishing) and after polishing with three different materials.

Methods:

20 discs for each GI group were obtained (A-Ionolux; B-IonoStar Plus; C-Ketac). Those groups were subdivided according to finishing and polishing subgroups 1 (control) - no polishing, 2 - polishing with prophylactic brush and pumice paste, 3 - Enhance tips with water, and 4 - Sof-Lex system with Easy Glaze and polymerization. For each disc face, the total distance analyzed was 2.88cm (6x48mm). Then, the roughness was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni test, with significant data if p<0.05.

Results:

The mean of roughness within Group A was lower for subgroup 4 (1.07±0.54 µm) and higher for subgroup 2 (2.33±1.17 µm). Within group B, B4 had the lowest mean of roughness (0.93±0.38 µm) and B2 (1.24 ± 0.78 µm) the highest roughness. Within group C, Group C4 had the lowest mean roughness value (0.84±0.54 µm), and C3 had the highest mean (2.48±1.05 µm). After polishing, subgroup 4 had the general lowest values for surface roughness (mean Ra 0.95), followed by subgroup 1 (Ra=1.27), subgroup 2 (Ra=1.89), and higher values for subgroup 3. All intragroup analysis for A, B, and C were statistically significant. Group A presented the highest roughness (p<0.05), and no statistically significant evidence existed between groups B and C (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

The reduction of the roughness of the materials is dependent on their composition and the polishing and finishing techniques applied.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: BBO / LILACS Assunto principal: Propriedades de Superfície / Polimento Dentário / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Idioma: En Revista: Rev flum odontol (online) Assunto da revista: Medicina Cl¡nica / Odontologia / Patologia Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal / Estados Unidos País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: BBO / LILACS Assunto principal: Propriedades de Superfície / Polimento Dentário / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Idioma: En Revista: Rev flum odontol (online) Assunto da revista: Medicina Cl¡nica / Odontologia / Patologia Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal / Estados Unidos País de publicação: Brasil