Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of convalescent plasma in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: findings from a controlled trial
Costa, T.P.; Aoki, M.; Ribeiro, C.M.; Socca, E.; Itinose, L.; Basso, R.; Blanes, L..
Afiliação
  • Costa, T.P.; Maternidade e Cirurgia Nossa Senhora do Rocio-HR. Diretoria Técnica e Qualidade. Campo Largo. BR
  • Aoki, M.; Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratório de Ciência e Tecnologia Aplicada è Saúde. Curitiba. BR
  • Ribeiro, C.M.; Instituto de Pesquisa do Vale da Ciência. São Paulo. BR
  • Socca, E.; Instituto de Pesquisa do Vale da Ciência. São Paulo. BR
  • Itinose, L.; Maternidade e Cirurgia Nossa Senhora do Rocio-HR. Diretoria Técnica e Qualidade. Campo Largo. BR
  • Basso, R.; Maternidade e Cirurgia Nossa Senhora do Rocio-HR. Diretoria Técnica e Qualidade. Campo Largo. BR
  • Blanes, L.; Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratório de Ciência e Tecnologia Aplicada è Saúde. Curitiba. BR
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 57: e13627, fev.2024. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1574234
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has driven the search for alternative therapies, including convalescent plasma, historically used in infectious diseases. Despite results in other diseases, its effectiveness against COVID-19 remains uncertain with conflicting results in clinical trials. A pragmatic, single-center, prospective, and open randomized controlled trial was carried out in a hospital in Brazil, with the aim of evaluating the impact of convalescent plasma on the clinical improvement of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale was used to measure clinical improvement, focusing on the reduction in disease severity by up to 2 points, while antibody and C-reactive protein levels were monitored over time. After hospital admission, participants were randomized 11 to receive convalescent plasma and standard treatment or to be part of the control group with standard treatment. Follow-up was carried out on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and/or at discharge. From January 14 to April 4, 2022, 38 patients were included, but 3 were excluded due to protocol deviations, resulting in a total of 35 patients 19 in the control group and 16 in the plasma group. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement between the convalescent plasma group and the control group, nor in secondary outcomes. The study had limitations due to the small number of patients and limited representation of COVID-19 cases. Broader investigations are needed to integrate therapies into medical protocols, both for COVID-19 and other diseases. Conducting randomized studies is challenging due to the complexity of medical conditions and the variety of treatments available.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. med. biol. res Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. med. biol. res Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil