Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resonance frequency analysis-reliability in third generation instruments: Osstell mentor®
Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro; Herrero-Climent, Mariano; Albertini, Matteo; Rios-Santos, Jose-Vicente; Fernández-Palacín, Ana; Bullon, Pedro.
Afiliação
  • Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro; University of Seville. Master’s Degree in Periodontology and Implants. Seville. Spain
  • Herrero-Climent, Mariano; University of Seville. Master’s Degree in Periodontology and Implants. Seville. Spain
  • Albertini, Matteo; University of Seville. Master’s Degree in Periodontology and Implants. Seville. Spain
  • Rios-Santos, Jose-Vicente; University of Seville. Department of Dentistry. Seville. Spain
  • Fernández-Palacín, Ana; University of Seville. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Seville. Spain
  • Bullon, Pedro; University of Seville. Department of Dentistry. Seville. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 17(5): 801-806, sept. 2012. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-103123
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Few studies assess repeatability and reproducibility in registers of resonance frequency analysis (a value of dental implant stability).

Objective:

Few studies assess repeatability and reproducibility in resonance frequency analyses (implant stability evaluation). This study is aimed at assessing reliability (repeatabilty and reproducibility) in the Osstell Mentor® system using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as the statistical method.Study

Design:

ISQ measurements of RFA were carried out by means of the Osstell Mentor® instrument in 58 implants in 19 patients. Six measurements were performed on each implant by means of two different Smart-Pegs (I and II). Three consecutive measurements were registered with each transducer.

Results:

Average ISQ varied from 72.43 to 72.60 and 73.26 in the first, second and third measurements, respectively with the SamrtPeg I and from 72.98 to 73.26 and 73.74 in the first, second and third measurements, respectively with the SamrtPeg II . Exactly equal values were observed in 10.43 and 12.1% of the cases with Smart-Pegs I and II, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.96 and 0.96 for Smart Pegs I and II, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility was 0.97 for both Smart-Pegs I and II.

Conclusions:

The RFA system contributed by Osstell Mentor® renders almost perfect reproducibility and repeatability, as proven by statistical analysis carried out by means of ICC with 95% confidence level. This instrument contributes highly reliable RFA measurements in dental implants (AU)
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Implantação Dentária / Encaixe de Precisão de Dentadura Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: University of Seville/Spain
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Implantação Dentária / Encaixe de Precisão de Dentadura Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: University of Seville/Spain
...