Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which is the appropriate surgical procedure for appendiceal adenocarcinoma: appendectomy, partial colectomy or right hemicolectomy?
Zhao, Bochao; Ma, Zhicheng; Wang, Jingchao; Wang, Weiqiang; Yang, Tao; Meng, Kewei.
Afiliação
  • Zhao, Bochao; Tianjin First Central Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Tianjin. People’s Republic of China
  • Ma, Zhicheng; Tianjin First Central Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Tianjin. People’s Republic of China
  • Wang, Jingchao; Tianjin First Central Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Tianjin. People’s Republic of China
  • Wang, Weiqiang; Tianjin First Central Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Tianjin. People’s Republic of China
  • Yang, Tao; Tianjin First Central Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Tianjin. People’s Republic of China
  • Meng, Kewei; Tianjin First Central Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Tianjin. People’s Republic of China
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(1): 297-307, jan. 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-229168
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT
Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the appropriate surgical procedure and clinical decision for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 1,984 appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients were divided into three groups based on the extent of surgical resection appendectomy (N = 335), partial colectomy (N = 390) and right hemicolectomy (N = 1,259). The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of three groups were compared, and independent prognostic factors were assessed. Results The 5-year OS rates of patients who underwent appendectomy, partial colectomy and right hemicolectomy were 58.3%, 65.5% and 69.1%, respectively (right hemicolectomy vs appendectomy, P < 0.001; right hemicolectomy vs partial colectomy, P = 0.285; partial colectomy vs appendectomy, P = 0.045). The 5-year CSS rates of patients who underwent appendectomy, partial colectomy and right hemicolectomy were 73.2%, 77.0% and 78.7%, respectively (right hemicolectomy vs appendectomy, P = 0.046; right hemicolectomy vs partial colectomy, P = 0.545; partial colectomy vs appendectomy, P = 0.246). The subgroup analysis based on the pathological TNM stage indicated that there was no survival difference amongst three surgical procedures for stage I patients (5-year CSS rate 90.8%, 93.9% and 98.1%, respectively). The prognosis of patients who underwent an appendectomy was poorer than that of those who underwent partial colectomy (5-year OS rate 53.5% vs 67.1%, P = 0.005; 5-year CSS rate 65.2% vs 78.7%, P = 0.003) or right hemicolectomy (5-year OS rate 74.2% vs 53.23%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate 65.2% vs 82.5%, P < 0.001) for stage II disease. Right hemicolectomy did not show a survival advantage over partial colectomy for stage II (5-year CSS, P = 0.255) and stage III (5-year CSS, P = 0.846) appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AU)
Assuntos

Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Apêndice / Adenocarcinoma Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Tianjin First Central Hospital/People’s Republic of China
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Apêndice / Adenocarcinoma Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Tianjin First Central Hospital/People’s Republic of China
...