Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet)
; Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Ed.impr.);12(6): 459-463, oct. 2007. tab
Article
em En
| IBECS
| ID: ibc-65277
Biblioteca responsável:
ES15.1
Localização: ES15.1 - BNCS
No disponible
Background. Bonding agents could be used as fissure sealants. This study compares the retention three fissure sealants (Delton®, Delton Plus® and Concise®) and a filled dentin bonding system (Optibond Solo®).Methods. Fifty-six children aged 7-8 years received fissure sealants either in the four permanent first molars, in the four deciduous second molars, or in all eight of these teeth. Every child received a different sealing material in each quadrant on a random basis. Clinical evaluation at 12 months was performed by a single blind examiner, and the retention was classified as either a success (total retention) or a failure (partial retention or not present).Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the four materials in permanent maxillary molars ordeciduous molars. In permanent mandibular molars, Optibond Solo® showed a lower percentage of retention (40.9%),significantly different (p=0.002) to that of Delton® (89.5%), Delton Plus® (87.5%) and Concise® (76.5%).Conclusion: One bottle dentin bonding system used as a sealant does not improve the retention of conventional fissuresealants.Clinical Implication: Because of the scarcity of studies on the use of dental adhesives as sealants, further studies are warranted for the final support of that conclusion
Background. Bonding agents could be used as fissure sealants. This study compares the retention three fissure sealants (Delton®, Delton Plus® and Concise®) and a filled dentin bonding system (Optibond Solo®).Methods. Fifty-six children aged 7-8 years received fissure sealants either in the four permanent first molars, in the four deciduous second molars, or in all eight of these teeth. Every child received a different sealing material in each quadrant on a random basis. Clinical evaluation at 12 months was performed by a single blind examiner, and the retention was classified as either a success (total retention) or a failure (partial retention or not present).Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the four materials in permanent maxillary molars ordeciduous molars. In permanent mandibular molars, Optibond Solo® showed a lower percentage of retention (40.9%),significantly different (p=0.002) to that of Delton® (89.5%), Delton Plus® (87.5%) and Concise® (76.5%).Conclusion: One bottle dentin bonding system used as a sealant does not improve the retention of conventional fissuresealants.Clinical Implication: Because of the scarcity of studies on the use of dental adhesives as sealants, further studies are warranted for the final support of that conclusion
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
06-national
/
ES
Base de dados:
IBECS
Assunto principal:
Selantes de Fossas e Fissuras
/
Cárie Dentária
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Ed.impr.)
/
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet)
Ano de publicação:
2007
Tipo de documento:
Article