Positive urine cytology but negative white-light cystoscopy: an indication for fluorescence cystoscopy?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible benefit of fluorescence cystoscopy (FC) in detecting cytologically 'confirmed' lesions when assessing urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, as negative white-light cystoscopy in cases of a positive cytological finding represents a diagnostic dilemma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2006, 348 patients, who had cystoscopy for surveillance or due to suspicion of urothelial carcinoma, presented with an entirely negative white-light cystoscopy at our hospital. However, 77 of the 348 patients (22.2%) were diagnosed with a positive cytological finding. All patients had white-light cystoscopy first and a bladder-wash cytological specimen was obtained, then FC, followed by cold-cup biopsies and/or transurethral resection of the bladder tumour. RESULTS: In the 77 patients with a positive cytological specimen FC enabled the detection of the precise site of malignancy within the bladder in 63 (82%). As malignant or premalignant lesions, there were 18 moderate dysplasias, 27 carcinoma in situ (CIS), and 18 pTa-1/G1-3 tumours. Moreover using FC, malignant or premalignant lesions were detected in 43 of 271 patients (15.9%) who had a negative cytological specimen (15 moderate dysplasias, six CIS, 22 pTa-1/G1-3). CONCLUSION: This study shows that FC is beneficial in the detection of malignant and premalignant lesions, if there is negative white-light cystoscopy but positive urine cytology. The immediate identification of the exact site of a malignant lesion during FC enables the physician to diagnose and treat these patients more accurately and with no delay.