Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and health-care-associated pneumonia: a vulnerability, a pitfall, and a fatal flaw.
Yu, Victor L.
Afiliação
  • Yu VL; Special Pathogens Laboratory and Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA. vly@pitt.edu
Lancet Infect Dis ; 11(3): 248-52, 2011 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21371658
The 2005 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Disease Society of America's guidelines for pneumonia introduced the new category of health-care-associated pneumonia, which increased the number of people to whom the guidelines for multidrug-resistant pathogens applied. Three fundamental issues inherent in the definition of hospital-acquired pneumonia and health-care-associated pneumonia undermined the credibility of these guidelines and the applicability of their recommendations: a vulnerability, a pitfall, and a fatal flaw. The vulnerability is the extreme heterogeneity of the population of patients. The fatal flaw is the failure to accurately diagnose hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia; inability to distinguish colonisation from infection in respiratory-tract cultures renders the guidelines inherently unstable. The pitfall is spiralling empiricism of antibiotic use for severely ill patients in whom infection might not be present. A vicious circle of antibiotic overuse leading to emergence of resistant microflora can become established, leading to unnecessary use of empirical broad-spectrum combination antibiotics and increased mortality. Controlled studies now show that administration of broad-spectrum combination antibiotic therapy can lead to increased mortality in uninfected patients. Proposed solutions include the use of individualised assessment of patients. Health-care-associated pneumonia should be broken down into several distinct subgroups so narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy can be used. Emphasis should be placed on defining the microbial cause of the pneumonia rather than reflex administration of empirical combination therapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção Hospitalar / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Pneumonia Bacteriana / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção Hospitalar / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Pneumonia Bacteriana / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos