Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[The benefits of digital chest drainage in pleural decortication in thoracic empyema. Prospective, randomized, control trial]. / Beneficios del drenaje torácico digital en pleurodecorticación por empiema. Estudio prospectivo, comparativo aleatorizado.
Mier, José M; Cortés-Julián, Gildardo; Berrios-Mejía, Juan; Víctor-Valdivia, Zotés.
Afiliação
  • Mier JM; Servicio de Cirugía Cardiotorácica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias INER, Ciudad de México, México. Electronic address: jmmo50@hotmail.com.
  • Cortés-Julián G; Servicio de Cirugía Cardiotorácica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias INER, Ciudad de México, México.
  • Berrios-Mejía J; Servicio de Cirugía Cardiotorácica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias INER, Ciudad de México, México.
  • Víctor-Valdivia Z; Servicio de Cirugía Cardiotorácica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias INER, Ciudad de México, México.
Cir Cir ; 85(6): 522-525, 2017.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28087049
BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak after pleural decortication is one of the most frequent complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of prolonged air leak between the digital chest drainage (DCD) system and the classic drainage system in patients with empyema class IIB or III (American Thoracic Society classification) in pleural decortication patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 37 patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized control trial over one year, consisting of 2blinded groups, comparing prolonged air leak as a main outcome, the number of days until removal of chest drain, length of hospital stay and complications as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The percentage of prolonged air leak was 11% in the DCD group and 5% in the classic group (P=0.581); the mean number of days of air leak was 2.5±1.8 and 2.4±2.2, respectively (P=0.966). The mean number of days until chest tube removal was 4.5±1.8 and 5.1±2.5 (P=0.41), the length of hospital stay was 7.8±3.7 and 8.9±4.0 (P=0.441) and the complication percentages were 4 (22%) and 7 (36%), respectively (P=0.227). DISCUSSION: In this study, no significant difference was observed when the DCD was compared with the classic system. This was the first randomized clinical trial for this indication; thus, future complementing studies are warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pleura / Pneumotórax / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Drenagem / Empiema Pleural / Complicações Intraoperatórias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Revista: Cir Cir Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: México

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pleura / Pneumotórax / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Drenagem / Empiema Pleural / Complicações Intraoperatórias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Revista: Cir Cir Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: México