Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integrated care pathway for rectal cancer treatment: health care resource utilization, costs, and outcomes.
Kobayashi, Silvia T; Diz, Maria D P E; Campolina, Alessandro G; De Soárez, Patricia C; Ribeiro, Ulysses; Nahas, Sergio C; Vasconcelos, Karina G M C; Capareli, Fernanda; Cecconello, Ivan; Hoff, Paulo M.
Afiliação
  • Kobayashi ST; 1Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 3Center for Translational Research in Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo 4Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 5Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 6Radiation Oncology Service 7Clinical Oncology Service, In
Int J Evid Based Healthc ; 15(2): 53-62, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28157723
AIM: Managed Flow C20 (MFC20) is an integrated care pathway (ICP) for rectal cancer implemented at a public teaching hospital. This study aims to quantify resource utilization and estimate direct costs and outcomes associated with the use of this ICP. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery, comparing the period before the ICP implementation (Pre-MFC20 group) and after (MFC20 group). We assessed times between treatment steps and quantified the resources utilized, as well as their costs. RESULTS: There were 112 patients in the Pre-MFC20 group and 218 in the MFC20 group. The mean treatment intervals were significantly shorter in the MFC20 group - from the first medical consultation to nCRT (48.3 vs. 87.5 days; P < 0.001); and from nCRT to surgery (14.8 vs. 23.0 weeks; P < 0.001) - as was the mean total treatment time (192.0 vs. 290.2 days; P < 0.001). Oncology consultations, computed tomography, MRI, and radiotherapy sessions were utilized more frequently in the Pre-MFC20 group (P < 0.001). The median per-patient cost was US$11 180.92 in the Pre-MFC20 group, compared with US$10 412.88 in the MFC20 group (P = 0.125). Daily hospital charges and consultations were the major determinants of the total cost of the treatment. There was no statistical difference in overall survival in the time periods examined. CONCLUSION:: Implementation of a rectal cancer ICP reduced all treatment intervals and promoted rational utilization of oncology consultations and imaging, without increment in per-patient costs or detrimental effects in overall survival.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Procedimentos Clínicos / Tempo para o Tratamento / Recursos em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Int J Evid Based Healthc Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Procedimentos Clínicos / Tempo para o Tratamento / Recursos em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Int J Evid Based Healthc Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Austrália