Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
KRAS biomarker testing disparities in colorectal cancer patients in New Mexico.
Greenbaum, Alissa; Wiggins, Charles; Meisner, Angela Lw; Rojo, Manuel; Kinney, Anita Y; Rajput, Ashwani.
Afiliação
  • Greenbaum A; Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
  • Wiggins C; New Mexico Tumor Registry, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
  • Meisner AL; Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
  • Rojo M; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
  • Kinney AY; New Mexico Tumor Registry, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
  • Rajput A; University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Heliyon ; 3(11): e00448, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29202108
INTRODUCTION: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend that all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receive KRAS testing to guide anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment. The aim of this study was to assess for disparities in KRAS testing and mutational status. METHODS: The New Mexico Tumor Registry (NMTR), a population-based cancer registry participating in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program, was queried to identify all incident cases of CRC diagnosed among New Mexico residents from 2010 to 2013. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven patients were diagnosed with mCRC from 2010-2013. As expected, KRAS testing in Stage 4 patients presented the highest frequency (38.4%), though testing in stage 3 (8.5%), stage 2 (3.4%) and stage 1 (1.2%) was also observed. In those with metastatic disease, younger patients (≤ 64 years) were more likely to have had testing than patients 65 years and older (p < 0.0001). Patients residing in urban areas received KRAS testing more often than patients living in rural areas (p = 0.019). No significant racial/ethnic disparities were observed (p = 0.66). No significant differences were seen by year of testing. CONCLUSION: Age and geographic disparities exist in the rates of KRAS testing, while sex, race/ethnicity and the year tested were not significantly associated with testing. Further study is required to assess the reasons for these disparities and continued suboptimal adherence to current ASCO KRAS testing guidelines.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido