Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy.
Lasevicius, Thiago; Ugrinowitsch, Carlos; Schoenfeld, Brad Jon; Roschel, Hamilton; Tavares, Lucas Duarte; De Souza, Eduardo Oliveira; Laurentino, Gilberto; Tricoli, Valmor.
Afiliação
  • Lasevicius T; a Department of Health Sciences , University Ibirapuera , São Paulo , Brazil.
  • Ugrinowitsch C; b Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
  • Schoenfeld BJ; b Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
  • Roschel H; c Department of Health Sciences , CUNY Lehman College , Bronx , NY , USA.
  • Tavares LD; b Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
  • De Souza EO; a Department of Health Sciences , University Ibirapuera , São Paulo , Brazil.
  • Laurentino G; b Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
  • Tricoli V; d Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance , The University of Tampa , Tampa , FL , USA.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 18(6): 772-780, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29564973
The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of resistance training (RT) on elbow flexion and leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Thirty men volunteered to participate in an RT programme, performed twice a week for 12 weeks. The study employed a within-subject design, in which one leg and arm trained at 20% 1RM (G20) and the contralateral limb was randomly assigned to one of the three conditions: 40% (G40); 60% (G60), and 80% 1RM (G80). The G20 started RT session with three sets to failure. After G20 training, the number of sets was adjusted for the other contralateral limb conditions with volume-matched. CSA and 1RM were assessed at pre, post-6 weeks, and post-12 weeks. There was time effect for CSA for the vastus lateralis (VL) (8.9%, 20.5%, 20.4%, and 19.5%) and elbow flexors (EF) (11.4%, 25.3%, 25.1%, and 25%) in G20, G40, G60, and G80, respectively (p > .05). G80 showed higher CSA than G20 for VL (19.5% vs. 8.9%) and EF (25% vs. 11.4%) at post-12 weeks (p < .05). There was time effect for elbow flexion and unilateral leg press strength for all groups post-12 weeks (p < .05). However, the magnitude of increase was higher in G60 and G80. In conclusion, when low to high intensities of RT are performed with volume-matched, all intensities were effective for increasing muscle strength and size; however, 20% 1RM was suboptimal in this regard, and only the heavier RT intensity (80% 1RM) was shown superior for increasing strength and CSA compared to low intensities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Força Muscular / Treinamento Resistido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Sport Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Força Muscular / Treinamento Resistido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Sport Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido