Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico reduce forest fragmentation.
Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos; Sims, Katharine R E; Potapov, Peter; Radeloff, Volker C.
Afiliação
  • Ramirez-Reyes C; SILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
  • Sims KRE; Departments of Economics and Environmental Studies, Amherst College, P.O. Box 5000, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01002, USA.
  • Potapov P; Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, USA.
  • Radeloff VC; SILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
Ecol Appl ; 28(8): 1982-1997, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29791763
Forest fragmentation can lead to habitat reduction, edge increase, and exposure to disturbances. A key emerging policy to protect forests is payments for ecosystem services (PES), which offers compensation to landowners for environmental stewardship. Mexico was one of the first countries to implement a broad-scale PES program, enrolling over 2.3 Mha by 2010. However, Mexico's PES did not completely eliminate deforestation in enrolled parcels and could have increased incentives to hide deforestation in ways that increased fragmentation. We studied whether Mexican forests enrolled in the PES program had less forest fragmentation than those not enrolled, and whether the PES effects varied among forest types, among socioeconomic zones, or compared to the protected areas system. We analyzed forest cover maps from 2000 to 2012 to calculate forest fragmentation. We summarized fragmentation for different forest types and in four socioeconomic zones. We then used matching analysis to investigate the possible causal impacts of the PES on forests across Mexico and compared the effects of the PES program with that of protected areas. We found that the area covered by forest in Mexico decreased by 3.4% from 2000 to 2012, but there was 9.3% less forest core area. Change in forest cover was highest in the southern part of Mexico, and high-stature evergreen tropical forest lost the most core areas (-17%), while oak forest lost the least (-2%). Our matching analysis found that the PES program reduced both forest cover loss and forest fragmentation. Low-PES areas increased twice as much of the number of forest patches, forest edge, forest islets, and largest area of forest lost compared to high-PES areas. Compared to the protected areas system in Mexico, high-PES areas performed similarly in preventing fragmentation, but not as well as biosphere reserve core zones. We conclude that the PES was successful in slowing forest fragmentation at the regional and country level. However, the program could be improved by targeting areas where forest changes are more frequent, especially in southern Mexico. Fragmentation analyses should be implemented in other areas to monitor the outcomes of protection programs such as REDD+ and PES.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Florestas / Agricultura Florestal / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Appl Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Florestas / Agricultura Florestal / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Appl Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos