Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on delivery preferences in Brazil.
Reiter, Marilia; Betrán, Ana P; Marques, Fernando K; Torloni, Maria R.
Afiliação
  • Reiter M; Evidence Based Healthcare Postgraduate Programme, Department of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Betrán AP; Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Marques FK; Evidence Based Healthcare Postgraduate Programme, Department of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Torloni MR; Evidence Based Healthcare Postgraduate Programme, Department of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 143(1): 24-31, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29920679
BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery rates in Brazil are among the highest in the world. User preference is often mentioned as an important factor driving this. OBJECTIVES: To identify, appraise, and synthesize the results of studies into delivery preferences in Brazil. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, LILACS, and PsycINFO databases were searched, without language restrictions, using "delivery" and "preference" from inception to November 4, 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cross-sectional or cohort studies with quantitative data on delivery preferences of lay persons in Brazil. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers performed study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. A meta-analysis of proportions with a preference for cesarean delivery was performed, including subgroups analyses. MAIN RESULTS: There were 28 studies with 31 071 participants included. The overall prevalence of preference for cesarean delivery was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.7%-27.7%; 28 studies, n=31 071). Cesarean delivery preference was higher among multiparas with previous cesarean deliveries (58.0%, 95% CI 56.6%-59.3%; nine studies, n=5542) than among multiparas without prior cesarean deliveries (17.3%, 95% CI 16.4%-18.2%; eight studies, n=7903), and among women with private health insurance (44.3%, 95% CI 43.0%-45.6%; nine studies, n=6048) than among those who depended on the public healthcare system (22.7%, 95% CI 22.2%-23.3%; 20 studies, n=24 314). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, most lay persons in Brazil did not prefer to deliver by cesarean.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cesárea / Parto Obstétrico / Preferência do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cesárea / Parto Obstétrico / Preferência do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos