Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physiological and Psychological Responses during Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training Sessions with Different Work-Recovery Durations.
Farias-Junior, Luiz Fernando; Macêdo, Geovani Araújo Dantas; Browne, Rodrigo Alberto Vieira; Freire, Yuri Alberto; Oliveira-Dantas, Filipe Fernandes; Schwade, Daniel; Mortatti, Arnaldo Luis; Santos, Tony Meireles; Costa, Eduardo Caldas.
Afiliação
  • Farias-Junior LF; Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Macêdo GAD; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Browne RAV; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Freire YA; Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Oliveira-Dantas FF; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Schwade D; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Mortatti AL; Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Santos TM; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
  • Costa EC; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
J Sports Sci Med ; 18(1): 181-190, 2019 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30787666
We compared physiological and psychological responses between low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) sessions with different work-recovery durations. Ten adult males performed two LV-HIIT sessions in a randomized, counter-balanced order. Specifically, 60/60 s LV-HIIT and 30/30 s LV-HIIT. Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), ventilation (VE), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), perceived exertion (RPE), and affect were assessed. During intervals, the VO2 (3.25 ± 0.57 vs. 2.83 ± 0.50 L/min), VCO2 (3.15 ± 0.61 vs. 2.93 ± 0.58 L/min), VE (108.59 ± 27.39 vs. 94.28 ± 24.98 L/min), and RPE (15.9 ± 1.5 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5) were higher (ps ≤ 0.01), while RER (0.98 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.03) and affect (-0.8 ± 1.4 vs. 1.1 ± 2.0) were lower (ps ≤ 0.007) in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. During recovery periods, VO2 (1.85 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.46 L/min), VCO2 (2.15 ± 0.35 vs. 2.44 ± 0.45 L/min), and affect (0.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8) were lower (ps ≤ 0.02), while RER (1.20 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.05; p < 0.001) was higher in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. Shorter LV-HIIT (30 s) elicits lower physiological response and attenuated negative affect than longer LV-HIIT (60 s).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção / Esforço Físico / Treinamento Intervalado de Alta Intensidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Sports Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção / Esforço Físico / Treinamento Intervalado de Alta Intensidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Sports Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Turquia