Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Clinical Results and Complications.
Lin, Guang-Xun; Huang, Peng; Kotheeranurak, Vit; Park, Cheul-Woong; Heo, Dong-Hwa; Park, Choon-Keun; Park, Jeong-Yoon; Kim, Jin-Sung.
Afiliação
  • Lin GX; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Huang P; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
  • Kotheeranurak V; Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Sriracha, Chonburi, Thailand.
  • Park CW; Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon Woori Spine Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Heo DH; Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
  • Park CK; Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, South Korea.
  • Park JY; Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim JS; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: mdlukekim@gmail.com.
World Neurosurg ; 125: 425-432, 2019 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30797907
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery (UBE) for the treatment of lumbar spinal diseases has achieved favorable results. In this systematic review, the technical nuances, surgical outcomes, and complications of UBE are summarized. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published to June 2018 was performed. Reported studies related to UBE were identified through searching the PubMed database. The outcomes measured included operative time, hospital stay, complications, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, and the Macnab criteria. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients and 679 levels were collected from the selected 11 studies. The mean follow-up was 15.2 months, the mean operative time was 81.3 minutes, and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.4 days. The mean overall complication rate was 6.7% (range, 0%-13.8%). The mean VAS score for leg pain decreased from preoperative 7.9 to 1.9 at final follow-up visit and the mean VAS score for back pain decreased from 5.7 to 1.8. The mean Oswestry Disability Index significantly improved from preoperative 63.7 to 18.6 at the final follow-up. The average satisfied outcome (excellent/good; based on the Macnab criteria) was 84.3% (range, 75.35%-95%). There were similar results between UBE for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and stenosis, including operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, and satisfaction rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the existing studies are limited to small cohorts and short-term follow-up, based on the given preliminary results and experiences of current studies, UBE may be a feasible option for lumbar spinal surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças da Coluna Vertebral / Neuroendoscopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças da Coluna Vertebral / Neuroendoscopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul País de publicação: Estados Unidos