Concordance in Discriminating Recordings of Different Lung Sounds Between Physiotherapists.
Respir Care
; 65(2): 177-182, 2020 Feb.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31551285
BACKGROUND: Auscultation is a fundamental part of the physical examination, but its utility has been questioned due to the low inter-rater concordance. We therefore sought to evaluate the concordance of the discrimination of lung sound recordings between experienced physiotherapists. METHODS: Lung sound recordings were selected and validated by an expert panel when Fleiss κ concordance was > 0.75. Eleven recordings were played for subject recognition using a portable computer in their workplace. Results were analyzed using Fleiss κ when looking for concordance between physiotherapists. Univariate regression was performed to determine if there was an association with clinical training, years of experience, academic accomplishment, or university affiliation. RESULTS: Sixty-nine physiotherapists with a median of 4 years of working experience (interquartile range 2-6 y) completed the study. There was moderate concordance (κ = 0.562; 95% CI 0.462-0.605) for overall lung sound recording discrimination. For continuous and noncontinuous lung sound recordings, discrimination concordance was substantial (κ = 0.63 and κ = 0.76, respectively). A bivariate analysis revealed that years of experience presented an inverse association with stridor recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between physiotherapists in discriminating recorded lung sounds was moderate. The ability to recognize stridor was inversely associated with years of work experience.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Auscultação
/
Gravação em Fita
/
Fisioterapeutas
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Respir Care
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Chile
País de publicação:
Estados Unidos