Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Urinary retention after total joint arthroplasty of hip and knee: Systematic review.
Cha, Yong-Han; Lee, Young-Kyun; Won, Seok-Hyung; Park, Jung Wee; Ha, Yong-Chan; Koo, Kyung-Hoi.
Afiliação
  • Cha YH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Lee YK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
  • Won SH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
  • Park JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
  • Ha YC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Koo KH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 28(1): 2309499020905134, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32114894
PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). The POUR is managed with urinary catheterization, which is associated with a risk of urinary tract infection and subsequent periprosthetic joint infection. The purpose of this review was to afford a comprehensive understanding of POUR and its management. METHODS: We identified 15 original articles concerning POUR after TJA, which were published from January 2010 to February 2019. The diagnostic method, incidence, risk factors, and management of POUR of the 15 studies were reviewed. RESULTS: The incidence of POUR was ranged from 4.1% to 46.3%. Ultrasound was used for the detection of POUR among the total of the 15 studies. The following factors of old age, male gender, benign prostatic hypertrophy, history of urinary retention, spinal/epidural anesthesia, excessive fluid administration, patient-controlled analgesia, the use of opiates, underlying comorbidities, and poor American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were risk factors for POUR. Most of the studies did not use indwelling catheterization during surgery. The POUR patients were managed with intermittent catheterization. The most common volume criterion for bladder catheterization was 400 mL. In inevitable use of an indwelling catheter, it should be removed within 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: This review provided an up-to-date guide for the detection and management of POUR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Micção / Bexiga Urinária / Retenção Urinária / Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Micção / Bexiga Urinária / Retenção Urinária / Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul País de publicação: Reino Unido