Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictive molecular pathology in the time of COVID-19.
Malapelle, Umberto; De Luca, Caterina; Iaccarino, Antonino; Pepe, Francesco; Pisapia, Pasquale; Russo, Maria; Sgariglia, Roberta; Nacchio, Mariantonia; Vigliar, Elena; Bellevicine, Claudio; Schmitt, Fernando C; Troncone, Giancarlo.
Afiliação
  • Malapelle U; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • De Luca C; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Iaccarino A; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Pepe F; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Pisapia P; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Russo M; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Sgariglia R; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Nacchio M; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Vigliar E; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Bellevicine C; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Schmitt FC; Pathology, IPATIMUP and Medical Faculty of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Troncone G; Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy giancarlo.troncone@unina.it.
J Clin Pathol ; 74(4): 234-237, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32434770
AIMS: In the time of COVID-19, predictive molecular pathology laboratories must still timely select oncological patients for targeted treatments. However, the need to respect social distancing measures may delay results generated by laboratory-developed tests based on sequential steps a long hands-on time. Laboratory workflows should now be simplified. METHODS: The organisation of the University of Naples Federico II predictive pathology laboratory was assessed before (March-April 2019) and during (March-April 2020) the Italian lockdown. RESULTS: The number of patients undergoing single or multiple biomarker testing was similar in 2019 (n=43) and in 2020 (n=45). Considering adequate samples for molecular testing, before the outbreak, next-generation sequencing was mostly used (35/42, 83.3%). Testing six genes had a reagent cost of €98/patient. Conversely, in 2020, almost all cases (38/41, 92.7%) were analysed by automated testing. This latter had for any single assay/gene a significant reagent cost (€95-€136) and a faster mean turnaround time (5.3 vs 7.9 working days). CONCLUSION: In the times of coronavirus, laboratory fully automated platforms simplify predictive molecular testing. Laboratory staff may be more safely and cost-effectively managed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Surtos de Doenças / Patologia Molecular / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Oncologia Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Pathol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Surtos de Doenças / Patologia Molecular / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Oncologia Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Pathol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália País de publicação: Reino Unido