Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Removal of Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List Increases the Administrative Burden of Surgeons and Continues to Cause Confusion.
Krueger, Chad A; Kerr, Joshua M; Bolognesi, Michael P; Courtney, P Maxwell; Huddleston, James I.
Afiliação
  • Krueger CA; Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kerr JM; American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Rosemont, IL.
  • Bolognesi MP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Courtney PM; Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Huddleston JI; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(10): 2772-2778, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32444233
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that the removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) inpatient-only (IPO) list has caused confusion among surgeons, hospitals, and patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether similar confusion was present after CMS recently removed total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the IPO list. METHODS: We surveyed the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons membership via an online web-based questionnaire in February 2020. The 12-question form asked about practice type and the impact that having both THA and TKA removed from the IPO list has had on each surgeon's practice. Responses were tabulated and descriptive statistics of each question reported. RESULTS: Of the 2847 American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons members surveyed, 419 responded (14.7% response rate). Three hundred forty-one surgeons (81%) stated that changes to IPO status have increased their practice's administrative burden. Fifty-four percent of surgeons reported that they have needed to obtain preauthorization or appeal a denial of preauthorization for an inpatient total joint arthroplasty at least monthly, while 257 surgeons (61%) have had patients contact their office regarding an unexpected copayment. Despite the commitment of CMS to waiving certain audits for 2 years, 43 respondents (10%) stated they had undergone an audit regarding a patient's inpatient status. CONCLUSION: The removal of THA and TKA from the IPO list continues to be an administrative burden for arthroplasty surgeons and a source of confusion among patients. CMS should provide additional guidance to address surgeons' concerns about preauthorization for inpatient stays, unexpected patient copayments, and CMS audits.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho / Cirurgiões Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho / Cirurgiões Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos