Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of Different Active Humidification Systems in High-Flow Oxygen Therapy.
Plotnikow, Gustavo A; Villalba, Darío; Gogniat, Emiliano; Quiroga, Corina; Pérez Calvo, Eliana; Scapellato, José Luis.
Afiliação
  • Plotnikow GA; Division of Physical Therapy and Respiratory Care, Intensive Care Unit, Anchorena Hospital, Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina. gplotnikow@gmail.com.
  • Villalba D; Capítulo de Kinesiología Intensivista, Argentinian Intensive Care Society, Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Gogniat E; Division of Physical Therapy and Respiratory Care, Intensive Care Unit, Anchorena Hospital, Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Quiroga C; Division of Physical Therapy and Respiratory Care, Clínica Basilea, Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Pérez Calvo E; Capítulo de Kinesiología Intensivista, Argentinian Intensive Care Society, Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Scapellato JL; Capítulo de Kinesiología Intensivista, Argentinian Intensive Care Society, Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Respir Care ; 65(9): 1250-1257, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723861
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the performance in terms of absolute humidity (AH), relative humidity (RH), and temperature of different heated humidifiers (HH) and circuits that are commonly used to deliver high-flow oxygen therapy in conventional ranges (30-60 L/min) and unconventional ranges (70-100 L/min). METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, an electronic thermohygrometer was used to obtain the required measurements. A mechanical ventilator was used as a source for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. For active humidification, the following equipment was used: a HH with standard disposable water trap circuit, 3 servo-controlled HH, and 7 circuits with a heated wire. Data on environmental conditions (ie, temperature, RH, AH) were collected from the laboratory during each measurement; the temperature, RH, and AH resulting from the application of 8 flows (30-100 L/min) were also recorded. Variables were compared with analysis of variance for repeated measurements with Tukey post hoc tests. A value of P < .05 was assumed to be significant. RESULTS: During the study, a statistically significant difference was found in the average AH for each flow for the different devices (P < .005). The highest AH values were recorded with the Fisher & Paykel MR850 and the Medtronic-DAR circuit (AH = 40.8 mg/L with flow of 50 L/min, P < .005), and the lowest AH values were recorded with the Flexicare FL9000 HH and the Flexicare circuit (AH = 11.4 mg/L with 100 L/min flow, P < .005). For flows > 50 L/min, the best performance for all flows in terms of AH was found with the Fisher & Paykel MR850 HH, regardless of the circuit used. CONCLUSIONS: During oxygen therapy with very high gas flows, HH devices behave differently and in many cases are inefficient in delivering adequate humidification, even at conventional flows. Caution is therefore recommended when selecting the device and flow settings for the implementation of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigenoterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigenoterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Estados Unidos