Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the performance of three methods to assess DOM dynamics within two distinct glacierized watersheds of the tropical Andes.
Rodriguez-Avella, K A; Baraer, M; Mark, B; McKenzie, J; Somers, L.
Afiliação
  • Rodriguez-Avella KA; École de technologie supérieure, University of Quebec, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal QC H3C 1K3, Canada. Electronic address: Katherine.rodriguez-avella.1@ens.etsmtl.ca.
  • Baraer M; École de technologie supérieure, University of Quebec, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal QC H3C 1K3, Canada.
  • Mark B; Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, 1036 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, Columbus, 43210-1361, United States.
  • McKenzie J; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal QC H3A 2A7, Canada.
  • Somers L; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal QC H3A 2A7, Canada.
Environ Pollut ; 265(Pt A): 115052, 2020 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32806424
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is recognized as a good indicator of water quality as its concentration is influenced by land use, rainwater, windborne material and anthropogenic activities. Recent technological advances make it possible to characterize fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM), the fraction of DOM that fluoresces. Among these advances, portable fluorometers and benchtop fluorescence excitation and emission spectroscopy coupled with a parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC) have shown to be reliable. Despite their rising popularity, there is still a need to evaluate the extent to which these techniques can assess DOM dynamics at the watershed scale. We compare the performance of in-situ measurements of FDOM with laboratory measurements of fluorescence spectroscopy within the context of two distinct glacierized watersheds in Peru. Glacierized watersheds represent unique testing environments with contrasting DOM conditions, flowing from pristine, vegetation-free headwaters through locations with obvious anthropogenic influences. We used an in-situ fluorometer and a portable multimeter to take 38 measurements of FDOM, pH and turbidity throughout the two catchments. Additionally, samples were analyzed in the laboratory using the EEM-PARAFAC method. Results were compared to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurements using standard high-temperature catalytic oxidation. Our results show that the three techniques together were able to capture the DOM dynamics for both studied watersheds. Taken individually, all three methods allowed detection of the watershed DOM main points of sources but in a more limited way. Due to the narrow bandwidth of the portable fluorometer used in the study, FDOM measurements were almost non-detectable to protein-like substances. Indeed, the more demanding EEM-PARAFAC was able to both differentiate between potential sources of DOM and provide an estimate of relative concentrations of different organic components. Finally, similar to FDOM but to a lesser extent, the DOC measurements showed some limits where protein-like substances make up most of the DOM composition.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Água / Rios País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Peru Idioma: En Revista: Environ Pollut Assunto da revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Água / Rios País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Peru Idioma: En Revista: Environ Pollut Assunto da revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido