Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants' Physical Activity Levels.
Janicijevic, Danica; Knezevic, Olivera M; Garcia-Ramos, Amador; Cvetic, Danilo; Mirkov, Dragan M.
Afiliação
  • Janicijevic D; Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Knezevic OM; Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Garcia-Ramos A; Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11129 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Cvetic D; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
  • Mirkov DM; Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 4030000, Chile.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33227905
BACKGROUND: Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels. METHODS: The concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [F0], maximum velocity [v0], and maximum power [Pmax]). RESULTS: F0 and Pmax were higher for knee extensors (effect size [ES] = 1.97 and 0.57, respectively), hip extensors (ES = 2.52 and 0.77, respectively), and shoulder flexors (ES = 1.67 and 0.83, respectively) compared to their antagonist muscles, while v0 was higher for knee flexors compared to knee extensors (ES = 0.59). Active males revealed higher F0 for knee extensors (ES = 0.72) and knee flexors (ES = 0.83) and higher Pmax for knee flexors (ES = 0.70), elbow extensors (ES = 0.83) and shoulder extensors (ES = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Músculo Esquelético / Fenômenos Biofísicos / Articulações Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Músculo Esquelético / Fenômenos Biofísicos / Articulações Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Suíça