Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intricate genetic variation networks control the adventitious root growth angle in apple.
Zheng, Caixia; Shen, Fei; Wang, Yi; Wu, Ting; Xu, Xuefeng; Zhang, Xinzhong; Han, Zhenhai.
Afiliação
  • Zheng C; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Shen F; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Wang Y; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Wu T; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Xu X; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Zhang X; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. zhangxinzhong999@126.com.
  • Han Z; College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. rschan@cau.edu.cn.
BMC Genomics ; 21(1): 852, 2020 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33261554
BACKGROUND: The root growth angle (RGA) typically determines plant rooting depth, which is significant for plant anchorage and abiotic stress tolerance. Several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for RGA have been identified in crops. However, the underlying mechanisms of the RGA remain poorly understood, especially in apple rootstocks. The objective of this study was to identify QTLs, validate genetic variation networks, and develop molecular markers for the RGA in apple rootstock. RESULTS: Bulked segregant analysis by sequencing (BSA-seq) identified 25 QTLs for RGA using 1955 hybrids of the apple rootstock cultivars 'Baleng Crab' (Malus robusta Rehd., large RGA) and 'M9' (M. pumila Mill., small RGA). With RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and parental resequencing, six major functional genes were identified and constituted two genetic variation networks for the RGA. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the MdLAZY1 promoter damaged the binding sites of MdDREB2A and MdHSFB3, while one SNP of MdDREB2A and MdIAA1 affected the interactions of MdDREB2A/MdHSFB3 and MdIAA1/MdLAZY1, respectively. A SNP within the MdNPR5 promoter damaged the interaction between MdNPR5 and MdLBD41, while one SNP of MdLBD41 interrupted the MdLBD41/MdbHLH48 interaction that affected the binding ability of MdLBD41 on the MdNPR5 promoter. Twenty six SNP markers were designed on candidate genes in each QTL interval, and the marker effects varied from 0.22°-26.11°. CONCLUSIONS: Six diagnostic markers, SNP592, G122, b13, Z312, S1272, and S1288, were used to identify two intricate genetic variation networks that control the RGA and may provide new insights into the accuracy of the molecular markers. The QTLs and SNP markers can potentially be used to select deep-rooted apple rootstocks.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Malus Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMC Genomics Assunto da revista: GENETICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Malus Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMC Genomics Assunto da revista: GENETICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Reino Unido