Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity and reproducibility of VO2 max testing in a respiration chamber.
Kleinloog, Jordi P D; van Laar, Stephen P G A; Schoffelen, Paul F M; Plasqui, Guy.
Afiliação
  • Kleinloog JPD; Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van Laar SPGA; Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Schoffelen PFM; Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Plasqui G; Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 31(6): 1259-1267, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33638918
The aim of this study was to investigate whether VO2 max can be accurately measured in a respiration chamber. Thirty participants aged 23.4 ± 3.9 years with a wide range in VO2 max were included. Participants performed four incremental cycle ergometer tests (VO2 max) with a minimum of 5 days between tests. These tests consisted of one familiarization test with face mask, followed by two VO2 max tests in the respiration chamber and one test with face mask in randomized order. Oxygen consumption and CO2 production were measured continuously using Omnical (Maastricht University, the Netherlands) gas analysis system. The mean VO2 max was 3634 ± 766 ml, which resulted in mean VO2 max per lean body mass of 60.8 ± 8.0 ml/kg. Repeated respiration chamber tests showed a high concordance, and no significant differences were detected between tests (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (Rc) = 0.99; ∆70 ± 302 ml/min; p = .38). There was high concordance between the mean VO2 max from both respiration chamber tests and the mean face mask tests, and no significant difference (Rc = 0.99; ∆41 ± 173 ml/min; p = .22) was observed. The Bland-Altman plots showed no proportional bias between different tests. In conclusion, the respiration chamber has been found to be a valid and reproducible method for measuring VO2 max. New research opportunities are possible in the respiration chamber, such as maximal exercise testing during 24-hour measurements.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consumo de Oxigênio / Câmaras de Exposição Atmosférica / Máscaras Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Med Sci Sports Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consumo de Oxigênio / Câmaras de Exposição Atmosférica / Máscaras Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Med Sci Sports Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Dinamarca