Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.
Zhao, Yaoping; Tao, Yan; Zheng, Shaoqiang; Cai, Nan; Cheng, Long; Xie, Hao; Wang, Geng.
Afiliação
  • Zhao Y; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Tao Y; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Zheng S; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Cai N; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Cheng L; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Xie H; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Wang G; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China. Electronic address: gengwangdoc@126.com.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 72(1): 115-121, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33895221
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). RESULTS: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 µg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31-7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30-7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (44 [35-49] vs. 42.5 [30-46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas das Costelas / Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral / Bloqueio Nervoso Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas das Costelas / Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral / Bloqueio Nervoso Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Brasil