Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of bedrest on cardiovascular events and complications associated with temporary pacemakers in patients waiting for permanent pacemaker implantation.
Hama, Tomoaki; Morita, Norishige; Ushijima, Akiko; Ueno, Akira; Iida, Takayuki; Ikari, Yuji; Kobayashi, Yoshinori.
Afiliação
  • Hama T; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Japan.
  • Morita N; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Japan.
  • Ushijima A; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Japan.
  • Ueno A; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Japan.
  • Iida T; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Japan.
  • Ikari Y; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hospital Isehara Japan.
  • Kobayashi Y; The Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Japan.
J Arrhythm ; 37(3): 669-675, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34141020
BACKGROUND: Patients with a temporary pacemaker (TPM) for bradycardias are required to maintain bedrest until permanent pacemakers (PPMs) are implanted because of the development of Adams-Stokes syndrome, worsening heart failure, or complications associated with TPMs is anticipated. However, bedrest may be detrimental in patients because it leads to disuse syndrome. This study examined whether bedrest could decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events or complications associated with TPMs in patients waiting for PPM implantation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 88 patients who had emergency hospitalization for the treatment of bradycardias, and a TPM was inserted during the waiting period before PPM implantation. We divided patients into two groups according to whether they underwent bedrest (Bedrest Group) or not (Ambulation Group) during the period that patients were supported with TPM. We evaluated whether bedrest was a predictor of adverse events using a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Adverse events occurred in 31 patients (35%). In the univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the Bedrest and Ambulation Groups (39% vs. 29%). In the logistic regression analysis, bedrest was not a predictor of adverse events (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-3.68, P = .497). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with TPMs for bradyarrhythmias during the waiting period for PPM implantations, bedrest might not prevent adverse events, such as cardiovascular events and complications associated with TPMs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Arrhythm Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Arrhythm Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Japão