Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Simulated and clinical aerosol spread in common periodontal aerosol-generating procedures.
Puljich, Anthony; Jiao, Kexin; Lee, Ryan S B; Walsh, Laurence J; Ivanovski, Saso; Han, Pingping.
Afiliação
  • Puljich A; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Jiao K; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Lee RSB; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Walsh LJ; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Ivanovski S; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia. s.ivanovski@uq.edu.au.
  • Han P; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia. p.han@uq.edu.au.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(9): 5751-5762, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35581347
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated particle spread associated with various common periodontal aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in simulated and clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A simulation study visualized the aerosols, droplets, and splatter spread with and without high-volume suction (HVS, 325 L/min) during common dental AGPs, namely ultrasonic scaling, air flow prophylaxis, and implant drilling after fluorescein dye was added to the water irrigant as a tracer. Each procedure was repeated 10 times. A complementary clinical study measured the spread of contaminated particles within the dental operatory and quantified airborne protein dispersion following 10 min of ultrasonic supragingival scaling of 19 participants during routine periodontal treatment. RESULTS: The simulation study data showed that air flow produced the highest amount of splatters and the ultrasonic scaler generated the most aerosol and droplet particles at 1.2 m away from the source. The use of HVS effectively reduced 37.5-96% of splatter generation for all three dental AGPs, as well as 82-93% of aerosol and droplet particles at 1.2 m for the ultrasonic scaler and air polisher. In the clinical study, higher protein levels above background levels following ultrasonic supragingival scaling were detected in fewer than 20% of patients, indicating minimal particle spread. CONCLUSIONS: While three common periodontal AGPs produce aerosols and droplet particles up to at least 1.2 m from the source, the use of HVS is of significant benefit. Routine ultrasonic supragingival scaling produced few detectable traces of salivary protein at various sites throughout the 10-min dental operatory. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The likelihood of aerosol spread to distant sites during common periodontal AGPs is greatly reduced by high-volume suction. Clinically, limited evidence of protein contaminants was found following routine ultrasonic scaling, suggesting that the the majority of the contamination consisits of the irrigant rather than organic matter from the oral cavity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raspagem Dentária / Assistência Odontológica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raspagem Dentária / Assistência Odontológica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Alemanha