Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Communicating doctors' consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations.
Bartos, Vojtech; Bauer, Michal; Cahlíková, Jana; Chytilová, Julie.
Afiliação
  • Bartos V; Department of Economics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. vojtech.bartos@unimi.it.
  • Bauer M; Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. vojtech.bartos@unimi.it.
  • Cahlíková J; CERGE-EI, a joint workplace of Charles University and the Economics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Chytilová J; Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nature ; 606(7914): 542-549, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35650433
The reluctance of people to get vaccinated represents a fundamental challenge to containing the spread of deadly infectious diseases1,2, including COVID-19. Identifying misperceptions that can fuel vaccine hesitancy and creating effective communication strategies to overcome them are a global public health priority3-5. Medical doctors are a trusted source of advice about vaccinations6, but media reports may create an inaccurate impression that vaccine controversy is prevalent among doctors, even when a broad consensus exists7,8. Here we show that public misperceptions about the views of doctors on the COVID-19 vaccines are widespread, and correcting them increases vaccine uptake. We implement a survey among 9,650 doctors in the Czech Republic and find that 90% of doctors trust the vaccines. Next, we show that 90% of respondents in a nationally representative sample (n = 2,101) underestimate doctors' trust; the most common belief is that only 50% of doctors trust the vaccines. Finally, we integrate randomized provision of information about the true views held by doctors into a longitudinal data collection that regularly monitors vaccination status over 9 months. The treatment recalibrates beliefs and leads to a persistent increase in vaccine uptake. The approach demonstrated in this paper shows how the engagement of professional medical associations, with their unparalleled capacity to elicit individual views of doctors on a large scale, can help to create a cheap, scalable intervention that has lasting positive impacts on health behaviour.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação em Saúde / Vacinação / Consenso / Vacinas contra COVID-19 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Nature Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação em Saúde / Vacinação / Consenso / Vacinas contra COVID-19 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Nature Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Reino Unido