Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intercropping maize with brachiaria can be a double-edged sword strategy.
Flausino, Bruno F; Machado, Carolina F M; Silva, José Hiago C; Ronchi, Cláudio P; Pimentel, Marco Aurélio G; Gontijo, Lessando M.
Afiliação
  • Flausino BF; Graduate Program: Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa - Florestal Campus, Florestal, Brazil.
  • Machado CFM; Graduate Program: Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa - Florestal Campus, Florestal, Brazil.
  • Silva JHC; Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa - Florestal Campus, Florestal, Brazil.
  • Ronchi CP; Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa - Florestal Campus, Florestal, Brazil.
  • Pimentel MAG; Embrapa Maize & Sorghum, Sete Lagoas, Brazil.
  • Gontijo LM; Graduate Program: Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Federal University of Viçosa - Florestal Campus, Florestal, Brazil.
Pest Manag Sci ; 78(12): 5243-5250, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36054418
BACKGROUND: Intercropping is commonly implemented as a way of promoting sustainable agriculture. Some of the benefits of intercropping include improving resource-use efficiency and soil quality as well as promoting pest control. As for pest control, intercropping can often engender pest repellency/confusion and promote natural biological control. Nevertheless, intercropping is not always a win-win strategy for pest management, with chances of sometimes either favoring or hampering pests and their natural enemies. Brazilian farmers commonly row-intercrop maize with brachiaria with the intent of forming a grass pasture for the feeding of livestock after maize harvest. However, very little is known about whether this intercropping can influence key pests and natural enemies in the maize agroecosystem. The overall aim of this study was to investigate how multiple groups of maize pests and natural enemies respond in terms of temporal abundance to this intercropping. RESULTS: Defoliation caused by caterpillars was higher in the intercropping treatment. Intercropping appeared to promote Dalbulus maidis while hampering aphids and Diabrotica speciosa. In general, the abundance of natural enemies was favored by intercropping. There was a reduction in maize productivity (i.e. fresh weight) in the intercropping treatment. Most results were season dependent. CONCLUSION: We believe that by considering together the pros and cons of intercropping maize and brachiaria in terms of pest management and soil conservation/fertility, the benefits of implementing this intercropping shall still outweigh its potential challenges. Nevertheless, the results and ensuing recommendations should be considered under the context of time and arthropod species. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zea mays / Brachiaria Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Pest Manag Sci Assunto da revista: TOXICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zea mays / Brachiaria Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Pest Manag Sci Assunto da revista: TOXICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido