Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak.
Ortíz-Barrios, Miguel; Jaramillo-Rueda, Natalia; Gul, Muhammet; Yucesan, Melih; Jiménez-Delgado, Genett; Alfaro-Saíz, Juan-José.
Afiliação
  • Ortíz-Barrios M; Department of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla 081001, Colombia.
  • Jaramillo-Rueda N; Department of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla 081001, Colombia.
  • Gul M; School of Transportation and Logistics, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34320, Turkey.
  • Yucesan M; Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Munzur University, Tunceli 62000, Turkey.
  • Jiménez-Delgado G; Department of Industrial Engineering, Institución Universitaria de Barranquilla IUB, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia.
  • Alfaro-Saíz JJ; Research Centre on Production Management and Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36901601
The use of emergency departments (EDs) has increased during the COVID-19 outbreak, thereby evidencing the key role of these units in the overall response of healthcare systems to the current pandemic scenario. Nevertheless, several disruptions have emerged in the practical scenario including low throughput, overcrowding, and extended waiting times. Therefore, there is a need to develop strategies for upgrading the response of these units against the current pandemic. Given the above, this paper presents a hybrid fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model (MCDM) to evaluate the performance of EDs and create focused improvement interventions. First, the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP) technique is used to estimate the relative priorities of criteria and sub-criteria considering uncertainty. Then, the intuitionistic fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (IF-DEMATEL) is employed to calculate the interdependence and feedback between criteria and sub-criteria under uncertainty, Finally, the combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) is implemented to rank the EDs and detect their weaknesses to device suitable improvement plans. The aforementioned methodology was validated in three emergency centers in Turkey. The results revealed that the most important criterion in ED performance was ER facilities (14.4%), while Procedures and protocols evidenced the highest positive D + R value (18.239) among the dispatchers and is therefore deemed as the main generator within the performance network.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisões / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisões / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Suíça