Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Two Culture-Based Detection Systems for the Isolation of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii in Raw Ground Poultry.
Nguyen, Paul T; Tuz, Karina; Juárez, Oscar; Restaino, Lawrence.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen PT; R & F Products, Inc., 2725 Curtiss Street, Downers Grove, IL 60188, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, 10 W 35(th) Street, Chicago, IL 60616, USA. Electronic address: rf@rf-products.net.
  • Tuz K; Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, 10 W 35(th) Street, Chicago, IL 60616, USA.
  • Juárez O; Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, 10 W 35(th) Street, Chicago, IL 60616, USA.
  • Restaino L; R & F Products, Inc., 2725 Curtiss Street, Downers Grove, IL 60188, USA.
J Food Prot ; 86(3): 100057, 2023 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916562
Arcobacters are emerging pathogens that have been underestimated due to a lack of a standardized isolation method. The aim of this research was to evaluate the ability to isolate Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii using two Arcobacter-specific culture detection systems: (i) the Houf broth and modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar supplemented with cefoperazone, amphotericin B, and teicoplanin (HB/mCCDA+CAT), and (ii) the Nguyen-Restaino-Juárez Arcobacter enrichment broth and chromogenic agar (NRJ-B/M). Both detection systems were evaluated for productivity ratio, sensitivity, and specificity. As a result, the productivity ratio for both plating agars were >90%, which indicates that the selective agents used in the two plating agars did not inhibit Arcobacter growth. Moreover, sensitivity evaluations using artificially inoculated retail ground poultry (n = 780) determined that both detection systems were able to isolate A. butlzeri with >95% sensitivity at the 0.1 and 1.0-2.0 CFU/g detection level. The sensitivity in A. cryaerophilus isolation was higher for NRJ-B/M (78.0% at 0.1 CFU/g; 95.1% at 1.0-2.0 CFU/g) when compared with HB/mCCDA+CAT (34.1% at 0.1 CFU/g; 51.2% at 1.0-2.0 CFU/g). Both detection systems resulted in <50% sensitivity when isolating A. skirrowii at 0.1 and 1.0-2.0 CFU/g; however, the sensitivity for NRJ-B/M was significantly higher than HB/mCCDA+CAT. At the detection level of 5.0 CFU/g, both detection systems were able to isolate A. skirrowii with 100% sensitivity. Specificity comparisons using uninoculated ground poultry samples (n = 40) indicated the growth of background microbiota were significantly inhibited or could be easily differentiated on NRJ-B/M (90.0%, specificity) when compared with HB/mCCDA+CAT (30.0%, specificity). Overall, these results show that the NRJ-B/M detection system is a more sensitive and specific detection system when isolating Arcobacter spp. from ground chicken.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aves Domésticas / Arcobacter Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Food Prot Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aves Domésticas / Arcobacter Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Food Prot Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos