Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Retrospective Chart Review Suggests That Coordinated, Multidisciplinary Treatment for Patients with Anorexia Nervosa Improves Odds of Weight Restoration.
Woodruff, Kary; Joy, Elizabeth A; Burns, Ryan D; Summers, Scott A; Metos, Julie M; Jordan, Kristine C.
Afiliação
  • Woodruff K; Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Joy EA; Office of Health Promotion and Wellness, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Burns RD; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Summers SA; Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Metos JM; Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Jordan KC; Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 17: 339-351, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284120
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The objective of this study was to conduct a secondary data analysis of clinical information documented in the electronic medical record to assess the clinical outcomes of patients who received three different treatment approaches on clinical outcomes for treatment of patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). Patients and

methods:

Historical electronic medical record (EMR) data on patients aged 6 to 80 years diagnosed with AN seen in a healthcare system between 2007 and 2017 were stratified, according to services received, into three groups Group A (n = 48) received hospital-based services; Group B (n = 290) saw one or two provider types; Group C (n = 26) received outpatient coordinated multidisciplinary care from three provider types. Clinical outcomes [body mass index for adults (BMI), body mass index percentile (BMI%ile) for pediatric patients] defined AN severity and weight restoration. EMR data were analyzed using a generalized mixed-effects model and a Markov Transition model to examine the odds of weight restoration and the change in odds of weight restoration across the number of provider visits, respectively.

Results:

Patients receiving coordinated multidisciplinary care had significantly higher odds of weight restoration compared with patients receiving hospital-based services only (OR = 3.76, 95% CI [1.04, 13.54], p = 0.042). In addition, patients receiving care from 1 to 2 providers (OR = 1.006, 95% CI [1.003, 1.010], p = 0.001) or receiving coordinated multidisciplinary care (OR = 1.005, 95% CI [1.001, 1.011], p = 0.021) had significantly higher odds of weight restoration per provider visit day compared with patients receiving hospital-based services only.

Conclusion:

This retrospective chart review supports the coordinated, multidisciplinary care model for the weight restoration in patients with AN in an outpatient setting.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Multidiscip Healthc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Multidiscip Healthc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Nova Zelândia