Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
German funders' data sharing policies-A qualitative interview study.
Anger, Michael; Wendelborn, Christian; Schickhardt, Christoph.
Afiliação
  • Anger M; Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Immunity, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Wendelborn C; Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Immunity, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schickhardt C; Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Immunity, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0296956, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330079
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Data sharing is commonly seen as beneficial for science but is not yet common practice. Research funding agencies are known to play a key role in promoting data sharing, but German funders' data sharing policies appear to lag behind in international comparison. This study aims to answer the question of how German data sharing experts inside and outside funding agencies perceive and evaluate German funders' data sharing policies and overall efforts to promote data sharing.

METHODS:

This study is based on sixteen guided expert interviews with representatives of German funders and German research data experts from stakeholder organisations, who shared their perceptions of German' funders efforts to promote data sharing. By applying the method of qualitative content analysis to our interview data, we categorise and describe noteworthy aspects of the German data sharing policy landscape and illustrate our findings with interview passages.

RESULTS:

We present our findings in five sections to distinguish our interviewees' perceptions on a) the status quo of German funders' data sharing policies, b) the role of funders in promoting data sharing, c) current and potential measures by funders to promote data sharing, d) general barriers to those measures, and e) the implementation of more binding data sharing requirements. DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSION:

Although funders are perceived to be important promoters and facilitators of data sharing throughout our interviews, only few German funding agencies have data sharing policies in place. Several interviewees stated that funders could do more, for example by providing incentives for data sharing or by introducing more concrete policies. Our interviews suggest the academic freedom of grantees is widely perceived as an obstacle for German funders in introducing mandatory data sharing requirements. However, some interviewees stated that stricter data sharing requirements could be justified if data sharing is a part of good scientific practice.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Organizações / Disseminação de Informação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: PLoS ONE (Online) / PLoS One / PLos ONE Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Organizações / Disseminação de Informação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: PLoS ONE (Online) / PLoS One / PLos ONE Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Estados Unidos