Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do Antibiotic-Impregnated Envelopes Prevent Deep Brain Stimulation Implantable Pulse Generator Infections? A Prospective Cohort Study.
Colditz, Michael; Heard, Tomas; Silburn, Peter; Coyne, Terry.
Afiliação
  • Colditz M; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Heard T; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Silburn P; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Coyne T; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 102(3): 137-140, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461818
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Infection after deep brain stimulation (DBS) implanted pulse generator (IPG) replacement is uncommon but when it occurs can cause significant clinical morbidity, often resulting in partial or complete DBS system removal. An antibiotic absorbable envelope developed for cardiac implantable electronic devices (IEDs), which releases minocycline and rifampicin for a minimum of 7 days, was shown in the WRAP-IT study to reduce cardiac IED infections for high-risk cardiac patients. We aimed to assess whether placing an IPG in the same antibiotic envelope at the time of IPG replacement reduced the IPG infection rate.

METHODS:

Following institutional ethics approval (UnitingCare HREC), patients scheduled for IPG change due to impending battery depletion were prospectively randomised to receive IPG replacement with or without an antibiotic envelope. Patients with a past history of DBS system infection were excluded. Patients underwent surgery with standard aseptic neurosurgical technique [J Neurol Sci. 2017;383135-41]. Subsequent infection requiring antibiotic therapy and/or IPG removal or revision was recorded.

RESULTS:

A total of 427 consecutive patients were randomised from 2018 to 2021 and followed for a minimum of 12 months. No patients were lost to follow-up. At the time of IPG replacement, 200 patients received antibiotic envelope (54 female, 146 male, mean age 72 years), and 227 did not (43 female, 184 male, mean age 71 years). The two groups were homogenous for risk factors of infection. The IPG replacement infection rate was 2.1% (9/427). There were six infections, which required antibiotic therapy and/or IPG removal, in the antibiotic envelope group (6/200) and three in the non-envelope group (3/227) (p = 0.66).

CONCLUSION:

This prospective randomised study did not find that an antibiotic envelope reduced the IPG infection rate in our 427 patients undergoing routine DBS IPG replacement. Further research to reduce IPG revisions and infections in a cost-effective manner is required.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Estimulação Encefálica Profunda / Antibacterianos Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Estimulação Encefálica Profunda / Antibacterianos Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Suíça