Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nutrition's checkpoint inhibition: The impact of nutrition on immunotherapy outcomes.
Vaz, Jennifer; Piver, Rachael; Brzezinska, Bogna; Suhner, Jessa; Sareddy, Sneha; Vuppala, Priyanka; Vernon, Marlo; Xu, Hongyan; Rungruang, Bunja; Johnson, Marian; Higgins, Robert V; Ghamande, Sharad; Richardson, Katherine P; McIndoe, Richard; Purohit, Sharad; Mysona, David.
Afiliação
  • Vaz J; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Piver R; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Brzezinska B; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Suhner J; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Sareddy S; Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Vuppala P; Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Vernon M; Department of Biostatistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Xu H; Department of Biostatistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Rungruang B; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Johnson M; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Higgins RV; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Ghamande S; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Richardson KP; Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • McIndoe R; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA; Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Purohit S; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA; Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address: spurohit@augusta.edu.
  • Mysona D; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA; Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 189: 129-136, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116830
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine if nutritional status effects response to immunotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review was conducted on gynecologic cancer patients who received immunotherapy at a single institution between 2015 and 2022. Immunotherapy included checkpoint inhibitors and tumor vaccines. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated from serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte count. PNI values were determined at the beginning of treatment for each patient and assessed for their association with immunotherapy response. Disease control response (DCR) as an outcome of immunotherapy was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease.

RESULTS:

One hundred and ninety-eight patients received immunotherapy (IT) between 2015 and 2022. The gynecological cancers treated were uterine (38%), cervix (32%), ovarian (25%), and vulvar or vaginal (4%) cancers. The mean PNI for responders was higher than the non-responder group (p < 0.05). The AUC value for PNI as a predictor of response was 49. A PNI value of 49 was 43% sensitive and 85% specific for predicting a DCR. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, after adjusting for ECOG score and the number of prior chemotherapy lines, severe malnutrition was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.85, p = 0.08) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.82, p < 0.001). Patients with PNI < 49 were at a higher risk of IT failure (HR = 2.24, p = 0.0001) and subsequent death (HR = 2.84, p = 9 × 10-5).

CONCLUSIONS:

PNI can be a prognostic marker to predict response rates of patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immunotherapy. Additional studies needed to understand the mechanistic role of malnutrition in immunotherapy response.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Nutricional / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos / Imunoterapia Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Nutricional / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos / Imunoterapia Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos