Menstrual Irregularity: A Physiological Adaptation to Cope Perceived Stress.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Menstrual cycle characteristics are regulated hormonally and are integrated at the level of the hypothalamus. Stress can affect the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis. The objective of the study was to analyse the stress levels of women and compare their autonomic tone and menstrual characteristics. METHODOLOGY: A group of 100 apparently healthy, young, female volunteers were included in this pilot cohort study. Subjects were assessed for perceived stress using the Perceived Stress Scale 14 Item (PSS-14) questionnaire, underwent a heart rate variability (HRV) test on the second, 10th, and 21st days of their menstrual cycle, and their menstrual history was recorded. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 21.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) software. Metric data were expressed in terms of numerical value and analysed as mean ± SD. Paired Student's T-test was used to compare the HRV data of all three days of the menstrual cycle separately, and p value<0.05 was considered significant. Menstrual irregularity was complained of by 13 subjects (Group A), and the rest (87 subjects) reported regular menses (Group B). RESULT: The perceived stress scores of Group A were significantly higher than Group B (32.53±5.062 vs 28.057±7.618; p=0.044). On second day, Group A had higher median R-R interval (714.38±106 vs 656.84±73.50 ms; p=0.015) and lower average heart rate (85.85±12.07 vs 92.39±9.98 bpm; p=0.034) than Group B, suggesting parasympathetic dominance. On the 10th day, Group A had a higher standard deviation of heart rate (7.09±1.88 vs 5.97±1.71 bpm; p=0.032) and a very low-frequency band (1105.94±984.12 vs 730.49±557.41 µs2; p=0.046) than Group B, indicating parasympathetic dominance in Group A. On the 21st day, Group A had a higher standard deviation of R-R interval (58.19±20.46 vs 44.85±14.55 ms; p=0.004), root mean square standard deviation (55.71±29.84 vs 31.89±15.99 ms; p<0.001), percentage of R-R differing by 50 ms (19.20±19.58 vs 10.87±10.31%; p=0.020), total power (3,440.23±2722.29 vs 2,068.28±1,322.49 µs2; p=0.004), high-frequency band (1,247.57±1173.54 vs 539.06±HPO438.92 µs2; p<0.001), standard deviation ratio of the Poincaré plot (0.53±0.19 vs 0.39±0.16; p=0.003), normalised HF (44.0±12.9 vs 35.4±10.6; p=0.009), and a lower LF/HF ratio (1.43±0.80 vs 2.11±1.16; p=0.043) and normalised LF (53.9±14.4 vs 64.1±11.9; p=0.006) than Group B, suggesting higher parasympathetic tone of Group A than Group B. CONCLUSION: Analysing these results, it can be concluded that, in apparently healthy young women, menstrual irregularity is a physiological adaptation to combat perceived stress and maintain parasympathetic dominance.