Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of acute myocarditis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.
Shyam-Sundar, Vijay; Mahmood, Adil; Slabaugh, Greg; Chahal, Anwar; Petersen, Steffen E; Aung, Nay; Mohiddin, Saidi A; Khanji, Mohammed Y.
Afiliação
  • Shyam-Sundar V; William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Mahmood A; Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
  • Slabaugh G; William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Chahal A; Newham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Glen Road, London E13 8SL, UK.
  • Petersen SE; Digital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Empire House. 67-75 New Road, London E1 1HH, UK.
  • Aung N; Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
  • Mohiddin SA; Center for Inherited CV Diseases, WellSpan Health, Lancaster, PA, USA.
  • Khanji MY; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Str, SW Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39179417
ABSTRACT
The management of acute myocarditis (AM) is addressed in multiple clinical guidelines. We systematically reviewed current guidelines developed by national and international medical organizations on the management of AM to aid clinical practice. Publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane were identified between 1 January 2013 and 12 April 2024. Additionally, the websites of relevant organizations and the Guidelines International Network, Guideline Central, and NHS knowledge and library hub were reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, two reviewers assessed the rigour of guideline development, and one reviewer extracted the recommendations. Two of the three guidelines identified showed good rigour of development. Those rigorously developed agreed on the definition of AM, sampling serum troponin as part of the workflow for AM, testing for B-type natriuretic peptides in heart failure, key diagnostic imaging in the form of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, coronary angiography to exclude significant coronary disease, indications for endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), and indications for immunosuppression and advanced treatment options. Discrepancies exist in sampling creatine kinase-myocardial bound as a marker of myocardial injury, indications for EMB, and indications for immunosuppression and treatment of uncomplicated AM. Evidence is lacking for the use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for myocardial imaging, exercise restriction, follow-up measures and genetic testing, and there are few high-quality randomized trials to support treatment recommendations. Recommendations for management of AM in the guidelines have largely been developed from expert opinion rather than trial data.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes / Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes / European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes (Online) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes / Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes / European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes (Online) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido