Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Significance of Combined Density and Deep-Learning-Based Texture Analysis for Stratifying the Risk of Short-Term and Long-Term Breast Cancer in Screening.
Vilmun, Bolette Mikela; Napolitano, George; Lauritzen, Andreas; Lynge, Elsebeth; Lillholm, Martin; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann; Vejborg, Ilse.
Afiliação
  • Vilmun BM; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Napolitano G; Department of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Lauritzen A; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lynge E; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lillholm M; Department of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Nielsen MB; Biomediq A/S, Strandlinien 59, 2791 Dragør, Denmark.
  • Vejborg I; Nykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Fjordvej 15, 4300 Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(16)2024 Aug 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39202310
ABSTRACT
Assessing a woman's risk of breast cancer is important for personalized screening. Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but parenchymal texture patterns offer additional information which cannot be captured by density. We aimed to combine BI-RADS density score 4th Edition and a deep-learning-based texture score to stratify women in screening and compare rates among the combinations. This retrospective study cohort study included 216,564 women from a Danish populations-based screening program. Baseline mammograms were evaluated using BI-RADS density scores (1-4) and a deep-learning texture risk model, with scores categorized into four quartiles (1-4). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for screen-detected, interval, and long-term cancer were adjusted for age, year of screening and screening clinic. Compared with subgroup B1-T1, the highest IRR for screen-detected cancer were within the T4 category (3.44 (95% CI 2.43-4.82)-4.57 (95% CI 3.66-5.76)). IRR for interval cancer was highest in the BI-RADS 4 category (95% CI 5.36 (1.77-13.45)-16.94 (95% CI 9.93-30.15)). IRR for long-term cancer increased both with increasing BI-RADS and increasing texture reaching 5.15 (4.31-6.16) for the combination of B4-T4 compared with B1-T1. Deep-learning-based texture analysis combined with BI-RADS density categories can reveal subgroups with increased rates beyond what density alone can ascertain, suggesting the potential of combining texture and density to improve risk stratification in breast cancer screening.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca País de publicação: Suíça