Challenges and prospects in advancing clinical neuropsychology.

ABSTRACT

In the ever-evolving field of clinical neuropsychology, significant methodological and conceptual limitations hinder progress. To ensure the continued relevance of this discipline amidst remarkable advancements in neuroscience, medicine, and methodology, these obstacles must be addressed. This opinion article identifies inherent limitations within current clinical neuropsychology, including issues such as multi-collinearity in neuropsychological assessments, lack of validated tools reflecting contemporary cognitive function models, and the use of divergent theoretical frameworks in evaluations, leading to a gap between theory and practice. The disconnect between behavior and biomarkers, particularly evident in neurodegenerative diseases but also relevant for other pathologies, together with the rise of genetic analyses, necessitate change. Methodological improvements are crucial for ensuring the discipline's future relevance. Looking ahead, key perspectives and challenges are outlined, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to cognitive functioning and congruent tools, patient engagement in experimental studies, rectification of biases, and exploration of variables like personality. Training professionals to bridge the gap between practice and research is essential. By addressing these challenges, clinical neuropsychology can not only adapt to the evolving landscape but also shape it, ensuring a brighter future for the field.