Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Drug-Related Problems of Intensive Care Unit Patients by Clinical Pharmacists: A Retrospective Study.
Çakir, Ahmet; Memis, Hasan; Gün, Zeynep Ülkü; Biçakcioglu, Murat.
Afiliação
  • Çakir A; Inönü University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Malatya, Türkiye.
  • Memis H; Inönü University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Malatya, Türkiye.
  • Gün ZÜ; Inönü University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Malatya, Türkiye.
  • Biçakcioglu M; Inönü University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Malatya, Türkiye.
Turk J Pharm Sci ; 21(4): 274-283, 2024 Sep 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224042
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The study aimed to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) and risk factors associated with the emergence of DRPs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Materials and

Methods:

This retrospective study included patients in the anesthesiology and reanimation ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Classification for DRPs version 9.1. The association between various patient-related factors, and having DRPs were evaluated.

Results:

In total, 222 patients were included in the study, 128 of which were male (57.7%). The number of DRPs was 388 in 135 patients (1.75 ± 2.47 DRPs per patient). The group in which at least 1 DRP was identified, the duration of hospitalization was longer than in the group in which no DRP was identified (p < 0.001). In the groups in which there was the presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission or mortality, the mean DRP count was significantly higher than that in the other group (p < 0.05). Age, duration of hospitalization, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at admission had positive relationships with the DRP count, but the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) showed a negative relationship (p < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression analysis (p < 0.001), in which the age of the patient, GCS score, APACHE II score at admission, duration of hospitalization, and presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission were included, only the APACHE II score at admission and duration of hospitalization significantly affected the emergence of DRPs. The major problem was related to treatment effectiveness (47.9%), followed by treatment safety problems (29.9%). The major causes of these problems were dose selection (44.0%) and drug selection (36.8). Interventions were made at the drug (97.2%) and prescriber level (2.3%). The acceptance rate of interventions and resolution rate of the DRPs were 93.6% and 85.1%, respectively. The top three medications that caused DRPs the most were as follows meropenem, colistin, and piperacillin/tazobactam.

Conclusion:

Clinical pharmacists can detect and treat DRPs quickly. Our analysis shows that clinical pharmacy services are needed in high-DRP wards like ICU.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Pharm Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Pharm Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Turquia