Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma.
de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha; Zacarias, Laíla Cândida; Campos, Nataly Gurgel; Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco; Madeira, Caroline Alves; Sousa Almondes, Jardel Gonçalves de; Leite, Camila Ferreira.
Afiliação
  • de Souza CCC; Graduate Program in Cardiovascular Sciences, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil.
  • Zacarias LC; Graduate Program in Cardiovascular Sciences, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil.
  • Campos NG; Master Program in Physiotherapy and Functioning, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
  • Fortaleza SCB; Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
  • Madeira CA; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
  • Sousa Almondes JG; Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
  • Leite CF; Graduate Program in Cardiovascular Sciences, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil.
Disabil Rehabil ; : 1-8, 2024 Sep 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39264096
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There are no disease-specific tools for assessing the functioning of patients with asthma. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with asthma.

METHODS:

101 individuals with asthma responded to the 36-item version of the WHODAS 2.0, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and Asthma Control Test (ACT). The following psychometric properties were tested internal consistency, factor structure, and convergent and discriminative validity.

RESULTS:

Homogeneity was found between WHODAS 2.0 items and domains, except "Getting along" (Cronbach's α = 0.57). When item "D4.5 Sexual activities" was deleted, the Cronbach's increased to 0.70. Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors (explained variance 56%). There was a strong correlation between the WHODAS 2.0 and AQLQ (r=-0.72) and between the WHODAS 2.0 and ACT (r= -0.59). There was no evidence of the influence of obstruction level (FEV1) on functioning.

CONCLUSION:

WHODAS 2.0 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing functioning in individuals with asthma. Exclusion of item D.4.5 Sexual activity increased the homogeneity between the items of the "Getting along" domain. When applied to asthmatics, the WHODAS total functioning score is preferable to the domain-specific scores.
WHODAS 2.0 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the functioning of patients with asthma.Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors that differ from the original six-domain structure of the WHODAS 2.0 36-item version.WHODAS 2.0 is recommended for professionals who rehabilitate patients with asthma.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Disabil Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Disabil Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido