Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Usability Evaluation Methods Used in Electronic Discharge Summaries: Literature Review.
Tesfaye, Wubshet; Jordan, Margaret; Chen, Timothy F; Castelino, Ronald Lynel; Sud, Kamal; Dabliz, Racha; Aslani, Parisa.
Afiliação
  • Tesfaye W; The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.
  • Jordan M; The University of Queensland School of Pharmacy, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Chen TF; The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.
  • Castelino RL; The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.
  • Sud K; The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.
  • Dabliz R; The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.
  • Aslani P; Nepean Kidney Research Centre, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e55247, 2024 Sep 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39264712
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With the widespread adoption of digital health records, including electronic discharge summaries (eDS), it is important to assess their usability in order to understand whether they meet the needs of the end users. While there are established approaches for evaluating the usability of electronic health records, there is a lack of knowledge regarding suitable evaluation methods specifically for eDS.

OBJECTIVE:

This literature review aims to identify the usability evaluation approaches used in eDS.

METHODS:

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases from their inception until July 2023. The study information was extracted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We included studies that assessed the usability of eDS, and the systems used to display eDS.

RESULTS:

A total of 12 records, including 11 studies and 1 thesis, met the inclusion criteria. The included studies used qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods approaches and reported the use of various usability evaluation methods. Heuristic evaluation was the most used method to assess the usability of eDS systems (n=7), followed by the think-aloud approach (n=5) and laboratory testing (n=3). These methods were used either individually or in combination with usability questionnaires (n=3) and qualitative semistructured interviews (n=4) for evaluating eDS usability issues. The evaluation processes incorporated usability metrics such as user performance, satisfaction, efficiency, and impact rating.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are a limited number of studies focusing on usability evaluations of eDS. The identified studies used expert-based and user-centered approaches, which can be used either individually or in combination to identify usability issues. However, further research is needed to determine the most appropriate evaluation method which can assess the fitness for purpose of discharge summaries.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res / J. med. internet res / Journal of medical internet research Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res / J. med. internet res / Journal of medical internet research Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Canadá