Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reducing the carbon footprint for a 30-bed haemodialysis unit by changing the delivery of acid concentrate supplied by individual 5 L containers to a central delivery system.
Murcutt, Gareth; Hillson, Rosie; Goodlad, Cate; Davenport, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Murcutt G; UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free Hospital London, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
  • Hillson R; Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, 8 King Edward Street, Oxford, OX1 4HL, UK.
  • Goodlad C; UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free Hospital London, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
  • Davenport A; UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free Hospital London, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. a.davenport@ucl.ac.uk.
J Nephrol ; 2024 Sep 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289296
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Haemodialysis treatments generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mainly as a result of the equipment, consumables and pharmaceuticals required. An internal audit demonstrated a 33% wastage of acid concentrate when using individual 5.0 L containers at a 144 dilution ratio. We therefore investigated whether changing the delivery system for acid concentrate would reduce wastage and any associated greenhouse gas emissions.

METHODS:

We calculated the difference for a 30-bed dialysis unit between receiving acid concentrate in single-use 5.0 L plastic containers versus bulk delivery for a central acid delivery system connected to the dialysis machines. Estimates of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions were made using the United Kingdom government database and other sources.

RESULTS:

A 30-station dialysis unit functioning at maximum capacity (3 shifts and 6 days/week), switching to bulk delivery and central acid delivery could realise an approximate total reduction of 33,841 kgCO2e/year; in reduced product wastage, saving 6192 kgCO2e, 5205 kgCO2e from fewer deliveries, and 22,444 kgCO2e saving from a reduction in packaging and waste generated, which equates approximately to a one tonne reduction in CO2e emissions per dialysis station/year.

CONCLUSIONS:

Switching from delivering acid concentrate in individual 5.0 L containers to a central acid delivery system can result in substantial reductions in CO2e emissions within a dialysis clinic. The emission savings from reducing the single-use plastic packaging greatly outweigh any gains from eliminating wastage of acid concentrate. Dialysis companies and clinicians should consider reviewing the design of current and future dialysis facilities and policies to determine whether reductions in CO2e emissions can be made.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Itália