Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Lymphovenular Anastomosis and Complex Decongestive Therapy for the Treatment of Lymphedema in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Zapata-Ospina, Alejandro; Lopera-Muñetón, Catalina; Betancur-Bedoya, Silvia P; Ángel-Bustos, Isabel C; Vásquez-Montoya, María G.
Afiliação
  • Zapata-Ospina A; Lymphatic Surgeon at Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Research Center Plastic Surgery and Supermicrosurgery, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Lopera-Muñetón C; School of Physiotherapy, Research center (FISIOTER), Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Betancur-Bedoya SP; School of Physiotherapy, Research center (FISIOTER), Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Ángel-Bustos IC; School of Physiotherapy, Research center (FISIOTER), Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Vásquez-Montoya MG; School of Physiotherapy, Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Medellín, Colombia.
Lymphat Res Biol ; 22(5): 232-240, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39320336
ABSTRACT

Background:

Lymphedema is a common breast cancer side effect, with an average incidence of 30%. The gold standard conservative treatment for lymphedema is complex decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapy, skin care, and exercise. Lymphovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a microsurgical technique that intends to redirect excess lymphatic fluid to the venous circulation; this procedure is usually performed when conservative treatment fails. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of LVA and CDT for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods and

Results:

The search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and LILACS. Inclusion criteria were (1) population women with BCRL; (2) intervention treated with LVA and CDT; and (3)

outcome:

primary outcome was lymphedema reduction. Secondary outcome was quality of life. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. The search found 3872 articles, with 5 articles meeting the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) criteria, 4 pre-post studies, and one observational cohort study. The total sample included 2763 patients. Follow-up was variable. The follow-up varies from 7.8 to 120 months, with an average of 35 months. Lymphedema reduction was obtained in the five studies.

Conclusion:

The present systematic review suggests that for patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer, the combination of both treatments is effective in reducing the size of the limb and improving quality of life. Low-quality evidence was found for both limb circumference reduction and quality of life. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias and improve the quality of evidence, in order to better inform clinical practice and enhance the care and well-being of patients with BCRL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Mama / Anastomose Cirúrgica / Vasos Linfáticos / Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lymphat Res Biol Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Mama / Anastomose Cirúrgica / Vasos Linfáticos / Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lymphat Res Biol Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Estados Unidos